Q-omics provides the consensus-scored TMEM26-AS1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. TMEM26-AS1 expression is associated with patient survival in 17 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, TMEM26-AS1 is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Additionally, TMEM26-AS1 RNA expression shows 14,306 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight KIRC, KICH, and THYM as cancer lineages where TMEM26-AS1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for TMEM26-AS1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes TMEM26-AS1 survival associations across molecular data types. TMEM26-AS1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (17). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible TMEM26-AS1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High TMEM26-AS1 expression shows unfavorable associations in LGG, GBM and DLBC, but favorable associations in KIRC, BRCA and HNSC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for TMEM26-AS1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes TMEM26-AS1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11. The strongest signals are observed in KICH for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for TMEM26-AS1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. TMEM26-AS1 shows lower tumor expression in KICH, KIRP, LIHC and THCA and higher tumor expression in BLCA and HNSC. The KICH box plot shows higher TMEM26-AS1 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.462, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with TMEM26-AS1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, TMEM26-AS1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
