RNA, U6atac small nuclear 36, pseudogeneGenealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6ATAC36P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6ATAC36P expression is associated with patient survival in 7 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6ATAC36P is differentially expressed in 3, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, RNU6ATAC36P RNA expression shows 10,133 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in TGCT. Together, these results highlight COAD, and TGCT as cancer lineages where RNU6ATAC36P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNU6ATAC36P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNU6ATAC36P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6ATAC36P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (7). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNU6ATAC36P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6ATAC36P expression shows unfavorable associations in COAD, PCPG, KIRP, MESO, LGG and THCA. The COAD Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify COAD as the clearest survival context for RNU6ATAC36P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNU6ATAC36P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 3. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6ATAC36P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6ATAC36P shows lower tumor expression in COAD, THCA and KIRC. The COAD box plot shows higher RNU6ATAC36P RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.090, t-test p = .042).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6ATAC36P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6ATAC36P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with TGCT recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
