RNU6-869P

associated omics data
RNA, U6 small nuclear 869, pseudogeneGenealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6-869P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6-869P expression is associated with patient survival in 13 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6-869P is differentially expressed in 4, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, RNU6-869P RNA expression shows 5,421 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight STAD, and KIRC as cancer lineages where RNU6-869P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes RNU6-869P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6-869P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (13). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
RNU6-869P data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier13STAD (72)view →
This table ranks reproducible RNU6-869P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6-869P expression shows unfavorable associations in STAD, THCA, UVM and UCEC, but favorable associations in LGG and SKCM. The STAD Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify STAD as the clearest survival context for RNU6-869P RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
STADDFSTertileAll0.3080.571<.00172view →
THCADFSTertileAll0.5250.839.00254view →
UVMDFSTertileAll0.0710.746<.00136view →
LGGOSTertileAll0.9650.861<.00131view →
SKCMOSTertileAll0.5290.310.00127view →
UCECOSTertileAll0.8950.928.01324view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 13 lineages →

RNU6-869P-STAD (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for RNU6-869P RNA expression in STAD: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes RNU6-869P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 4. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
RNU6-869P data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot4KIRC (7)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6-869P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6-869P shows lower tumor expression in KIRC, BRCA, LUSC and KICH. The KIRC box plot shows higher RNU6-869P RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.140, t-test p = .002).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCAllAll−0.140.0027view →
BRCAAllII,III,IV−0.333<.0016view →
LUSCMaleII,III,IV−0.217.0332view →
KICHAllIV−0.612.0401view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 4 lineages →

RNU6-869P-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for RNU6-869P in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6-869P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6-869P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
Function (RNA)5,421STAD (3479)view →
RNA4,107SKCM (1351)view →