RNA, U6 small nuclear 642, pseudogeneGenealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6-642P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6-642P expression is associated with patient survival in 13 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in MESO. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6-642P is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, RNU6-642P RNA expression shows 6,708 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UCEC. Together, these results highlight MESO, COAD, and UCEC as cancer lineages where RNU6-642P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNU6-642P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNU6-642P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6-642P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (13). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNU6-642P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6-642P expression shows unfavorable associations in MESO, LIHC and CESC, but favorable associations in OV, UCS and UCEC. The MESO Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify MESO as the clearest survival context for RNU6-642P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNU6-642P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6-642P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6-642P shows higher tumor expression in COAD and LUSC. The COAD box plot shows higher RNU6-642P RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.199, t-test p = .041).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6-642P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6-642P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UCEC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
