RNU6-406P

associated omics data
RNA, U6 small nuclear 406, pseudogeneGenealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6-406P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6-406P expression is associated with patient survival in 12 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6-406P is differentially expressed in 1, with the highest sampling consensus in LUSC. Additionally, RNU6-406P RNA expression shows 6,265 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ESCA. Together, these results highlight STAD, LUSC, and ESCA as cancer lineages where RNU6-406P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes RNU6-406P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6-406P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (12). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
RNU6-406P data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier12STAD (72)view →
This table ranks reproducible RNU6-406P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6-406P expression shows unfavorable associations in STAD, MESO, PRAD, LUAD and PCPG, but favorable associations in ESCA. The STAD Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p = .002). Together, the overview and detailed table identify STAD as the clearest survival context for RNU6-406P RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
STADDFSTertileAll0.3540.570.00272view →
MESOOSTertileIII,IV0.0360.563<.00154view →
ESCAOSTertileAll0.8750.632.00754view →
PRADDFSTertileAll0.6770.937<.00130view →
LUADDFSTertileII,III,IV0.2690.586.00324view →
PCPGDFSTertileAll0.2290.821.03118view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 12 lineages →

RNU6-406P-STAD (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for RNU6-406P RNA expression in STAD: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes RNU6-406P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 1. The strongest signals are observed in LUSC for RNA.
RNU6-406P data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot1LUSC (2)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6-406P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6-406P shows higher tumor expression in LUSC. The LUSC box plot shows higher RNU6-406P RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.152, t-test p = .023).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
LUSCAllAll+0.152.0232view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 1 lineages →

RNU6-406P-LUSC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for RNU6-406P in LUSC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6-406P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6-406P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ESCA recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA6,265ESCA (1660)view →
Function (RNA)6,189STAD (5259)view →