RNA, U6 small nuclear 301, pseudogeneGenealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6-301P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6-301P expression is associated with patient survival in 13 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6-301P is differentially expressed in 6, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Additionally, RNU6-301P RNA expression shows 13,114 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in TGCT. Together, these results highlight COAD, HNSC, and TGCT as cancer lineages where RNU6-301P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNU6-301P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNU6-301P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6-301P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (13). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNU6-301P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6-301P expression shows unfavorable associations in COAD, READ, KIRC, MESO and UVM, but favorable associations in LUAD. The COAD Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify COAD as the clearest survival context for RNU6-301P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNU6-301P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 6. The strongest signals are observed in HNSC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6-301P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6-301P shows lower tumor expression in UCEC and higher tumor expression in HNSC, LUSC, KIRC, BRCA and LUAD. The HNSC box plot shows higher RNU6-301P RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.634, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6-301P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6-301P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with TGCT recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
