RFC4

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, RFC4 Mutation is linked to patient survival in 3 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated RFC4 data layer compared with 29 for mass-spec protein and 4 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), where higher RFC4 Mutation is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated RFC4 expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as UCEC show a favorable association.

HNSC, LUAD, and UCEC are the cancer types where RFC4 Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.

Lineage	Measure	Split	Stage	AUC1 high	AUC2 low	p	Sampling consensus
HNSC	OS	Median	All	0.188	0.769	<.001	33	view →
LUAD	OS	Median	III,IV	0.223	0.677	.006	24	view →
UCEC	DFS	Median	All	1.000	0.629	.026	12	view →

Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 3 strongest of 3 lineages.

RFC4–HNSC (OS)

Open the HNSC breakdown →