PLCE1-AS2

associated omics data
PLCE1 antisense RNA 2Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored PLCE1-AS2 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. PLCE1-AS2 expression is associated with patient survival in 16 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, PLCE1-AS2 is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, PLCE1-AS2 RNA expression shows 14,283 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LUAD. Together, these results highlight KIRC, COAD, and LUAD as cancer lineages where PLCE1-AS2 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes PLCE1-AS2 survival associations across molecular data types. PLCE1-AS2 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (16). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
PLCE1-AS2 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier16KIRC (106)view →
This table ranks reproducible PLCE1-AS2 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High PLCE1-AS2 expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, READ, ESCA, COAD and LGG, but favorable associations in SARC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for PLCE1-AS2 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCOSMedianAll0.5260.692<.001106view →
READDFSTertileIV0.1250.700<.00142view →
ESCAOSMedianAll0.4181.000.00535view →
COADOSMedianII,III,IV0.6880.857.00121view →
SARCDFSTertileAll0.6710.475.01614view →
LGGOSMedianAll0.7130.898<.00111view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 16 lineages →

PLCE1-AS2-KIRC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for PLCE1-AS2 RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes PLCE1-AS2 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA.
PLCE1-AS2 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot2COAD (5)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for PLCE1-AS2. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. PLCE1-AS2 shows lower tumor expression in COAD and higher tumor expression in KIRC. The COAD box plot shows higher PLCE1-AS2 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.042, t-test p = .002).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
COADAllII,III,IV−0.042.0025view →
KIRCMaleIV+0.012.0411view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 2 lineages →

PLCE1-AS2-COAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for PLCE1-AS2 in COAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with PLCE1-AS2 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, PLCE1-AS2 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LUAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
Protein (mass-spec)14,283LUAD (3589)view →
RNA10,489ESCA (2970)view →