Q-omics provides the consensus-scored NDFIP2-AS1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. NDFIP2-AS1 expression is associated with patient survival in 12 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in SKCM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, NDFIP2-AS1 is differentially expressed in 3, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Additionally, NDFIP2-AS1 RNA expression shows 5,469 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight SKCM, KICH, and STAD as cancer lineages where NDFIP2-AS1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for NDFIP2-AS1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes NDFIP2-AS1 survival associations across molecular data types. NDFIP2-AS1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (12). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible NDFIP2-AS1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High NDFIP2-AS1 expression shows unfavorable associations in SKCM, LIHC, HNSC and ESCA, but favorable associations in MESO and KIRP. The SKCM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p = .009). Together, the overview and detailed table identify SKCM as the clearest survival context for NDFIP2-AS1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes NDFIP2-AS1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 3. The strongest signals are observed in KICH for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for NDFIP2-AS1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. NDFIP2-AS1 shows lower tumor expression in KICH and KIRC and higher tumor expression in COAD. The KICH box plot shows higher NDFIP2-AS1 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.219, t-test p = .022).
This table shows molecular features associated with NDFIP2-AS1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, NDFIP2-AS1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
