MT-TG

associated omics data
Gene

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored MT-TG profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. MT-TG expression is associated with patient survival in 15 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, MT-TG is differentially expressed in 7, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, MT-TG RNA expression shows 9,204 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Together, these results highlight THYM, KIRC, and ACC as cancer lineages where MT-TG shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes MT-TG survival associations across molecular data types. MT-TG RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (15). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
MT-TG data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier15THYM (93)view →
This table ranks reproducible MT-TG RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High MT-TG expression shows unfavorable associations in THYM, CHOL, KIRC and LUAD, but favorable associations in STAD and CESC. The THYM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify THYM as the clearest survival context for MT-TG RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
THYMDFSTertileAll0.6750.920<.00193view →
CHOLOSTertileII,III,IV0.0880.812<.00193view →
KIRCOSQuartileII,III,IV0.6210.735.01425view →
STADOSTertileAll0.7200.520.0329view →
CESCOSMedianAll0.9080.840.0228view →
LUADOSQuartileAll0.5930.719.0208view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 15 lineages →

MT-TG-THYM (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for MT-TG RNA expression in THYM: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes MT-TG tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 7. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
MT-TG data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot7KIRC (8)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for MT-TG. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. MT-TG shows lower tumor expression in KIRC, UCEC, KIRP, HNSC and BRCA and higher tumor expression in COAD. The KIRC box plot shows higher MT-TG RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.611, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCFemaleAll−0.611<.0018view →
UCECAllII,III,IV−0.808.0334view →
KIRPAllIV−1.145.0192view →
COADAllAll+0.348.0292view →
HNSCAllIII,IV−0.223.0302view →
BRCAFemaleAll−0.202.0412view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 7 lineages →

MT-TG-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for MT-TG in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with MT-TG in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, MT-TG shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ACC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA9,204ACC (4492)view →
Function (RNA)5,880LGG (2027)view →