GHITM

mass-spec protein & survival
Survivalmass-specKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, GHITM mass-spec protein is linked to patient survival in 6 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated GHITM data layer compared with 24 for mass-spec protein and 4 for mutation status.

The strongest signal is observed in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), where higher GHITM mass-spec protein is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated GHITM expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as GBM show a favorable association.

LUAD, CCRCC, and PDAC are the cancer types where GHITM mass-spec protein most reproducibly stratifies survival.

mass-spec protein survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
LUADOSMedianAll0.7220.917.00427view →
CCRCCDFSMedianAll0.7160.893.01614view →
PDACDFSQuartileAll0.2750.660.0089view →
COADDFSMedianIV0.4930.944.0316view →
UCECDFSTertileAll0.8731.000.0472view →
GBMOSMedianAll0.8720.695.0301view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 6 strongest of 6 lineages.

GHITM–LUAD (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for GHITM mass-spec protein-high vs -low samples in LUAD.

Open the LUAD breakdown →

Exploration