ETNPPL

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, ETNPPL Mutation is linked to patient survival in 4 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated ETNPPL data layer compared with 27 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA), where higher ETNPPL Mutation is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated ETNPPL expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as LUAD show a favorable association.

BLCA, ESCA, and UCEC are the cancer types where ETNPPL Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
BLCAOSMedianIV0.0180.600<.00112view →
ESCADFSMedianIII,IV0.1430.448.0306view →
UCECOSMedianIV0.2310.592.0366view →
LUADDFSMedianAll1.0000.657.0332view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 4 strongest of 4 lineages.

ETNPPL–BLCA (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for ETNPPL mutant vs wild-type samples in BLCA.

Open the BLCA breakdown →

Exploration