Q-omics provides the consensus-scored ELOAP1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. ELOAP1 expression is associated with patient survival in 7 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, ELOAP1 is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Additionally, ELOAP1 RNA expression shows 5,914 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight KICH, HNSC, and STAD as cancer lineages where ELOAP1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for ELOAP1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes ELOAP1 survival associations across molecular data types. ELOAP1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (7). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible ELOAP1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High ELOAP1 expression shows unfavorable associations in KICH, KIRC, OV, LUSC, TGCT and PRAD. The KICH Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KICH as the clearest survival context for ELOAP1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes ELOAP1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in HNSC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for ELOAP1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. ELOAP1 shows lower tumor expression in PAAD and higher tumor expression in HNSC. The HNSC box plot shows higher ELOAP1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.008, t-test p = .035).
This table shows molecular features associated with ELOAP1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, ELOAP1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
