Q-omics provides the consensus-scored EDRF1-AS1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. EDRF1-AS1 expression is associated with patient survival in 24 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, EDRF1-AS1 is differentially expressed in 9, with the highest sampling consensus in BLCA. Additionally, EDRF1-AS1 RNA expression shows 20,040 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight HNSC, BLCA, and THYM as cancer lineages where EDRF1-AS1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for EDRF1-AS1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes EDRF1-AS1 survival associations across molecular data types. EDRF1-AS1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (24). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible EDRF1-AS1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High EDRF1-AS1 expression shows unfavorable associations in KICH, UVM and ACC, but favorable associations in HNSC, BRCA and READ. The HNSC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify HNSC as the clearest survival context for EDRF1-AS1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes EDRF1-AS1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 9. The strongest signals are observed in BLCA for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for EDRF1-AS1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. EDRF1-AS1 shows higher tumor expression in BLCA, LIHC, COAD, CHOL, BRCA and PRAD. The BLCA box plot shows higher EDRF1-AS1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.161, t-test p = .013).
This table shows molecular features associated with EDRF1-AS1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, EDRF1-AS1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
