CCDC106

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, CCDC106 Mutation is linked to patient survival in 3 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated CCDC106 data layer compared with 25 for mass-spec protein and 3 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), where higher CCDC106 Mutation is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated CCDC106 expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker.

LUAD, UCEC, and SKCM are the cancer types where CCDC106 Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
LUADOSMedianII,III,IV0.1090.750<.00124view →
UCECOSMedianIV0.2310.592.0366view →
SKCMOSMedianIII,IV0.2450.721.0186view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 3 strongest of 3 lineages.

CCDC106–LUAD (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CCDC106 mutant vs wild-type samples in LUAD.

Open the LUAD breakdown →

Exploration