Negative regulation of double-strand break repair via nonhomologous end joining

pathway activity — cross-omics
GO:2001033Cross-omicsRNA → PROTEIN-MSPatientPairwise association · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA patient cohorts, RNA activity of the Negative regulation of double-strand break repair via nonhomologous end joining pathway is significantly associated with the protein abundance of multiple proteins, with the LUAD cohort showing a particularly strong set of associations.

The most reproducible pathway-associated proteins across cancer lineages are CIT, RPL12_S38, and RRP36_S73, each associated with the pathway in up to 7 cancer types. Since the analysis shows associations rather than directional relationships, both pathway-to-partner and partner-to-pathway views are reported.

Each partner is linked to its corresponding Q-omics profile. The scatter plot shows the strongest association, Negative regulation of double-strand break repair via nonhomologous end joining activity versus CIT in LUAD (Pearson r = 0.37).

Pathway-associated proteins by consensus

Ranked by combined sampling and lineage consensus. X-score (pathway→partner) and Y-score (partner→pathway) are standardized regression coefficients; both directions are reported because the association is undirected. The reported p-values are derived from the association test.
LineagePartner proteinX-scoreY-scorep(X)p(Y)Sampling consensusLineage consensus
LUADCIT →+0.928+0.067<.001<.00137
LSCCRPL12_S38 →+0.788+0.056<.001<.00136
LSCCRRP36_S73 →+0.816+0.072<.001<.00136
UCECTBC1D17 →-0.245-0.060<.001.00436
UCECUTP4 →+0.334+0.102<.001<.00136
BRCACDC20_S41 →+0.814+0.047<.001<.00136
Each partner links to its Q-omics profile. Showing the 6 strongest associations by consensus.

GO:2001033 vs CIT — LUAD

Per-sample scatter of Negative regulation of double-strand break repair via nonhomologous end joining activity vs CIT in LUAD.

Explore this scatter interactively →

Exploration