USP32

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, USP32 Mutation is linked to patient survival in 10 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated USP32 data layer compared with 26 for mass-spec protein and 4 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC), where higher USP32 Mutation is associated with worse disease-free survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated USP32 expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as UCEC and SKCM show a favorable association.

CESC, COAD, and THCA are the cancer types where USP32 Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
CESCDFSMedianII,III,IV0.1630.716<.00112view →
COADDFSMedianAll0.2390.693.0098view →
THCADFSMedianAll0.0890.841<.0016view →
HNSCDFSMedianIV0.1160.670.0026view →
ESCAOSMedianAll0.0800.681<.0016view →
PRADDFSMedianAll0.6170.886.0116view →
LGGDFSMedianAll0.1100.826<.0013view →
SCLCOSMedianAll0.2190.650.0313view →
UCECDFSMedianII,III,IV0.8400.434.0352view →
SKCMOSMedianAll0.9660.867.0341view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 10 strongest of 10 lineages.

USP32–CESC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for USP32 mutant vs wild-type samples in CESC.

Open the CESC breakdown →

Exploration