TSPY22P

associated omics data
testis specific protein Y-linked 22, pseudogeneGenealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored TSPY22P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. TSPY22P expression is associated with patient survival in 5 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in LIHC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, TSPY22P is differentially expressed in 1, with the highest sampling consensus in LUAD. Additionally, TSPY22P RNA expression shows 5,063 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Together, these results highlight LIHC, LUAD, and COAD as cancer lineages where TSPY22P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes TSPY22P survival associations across molecular data types. TSPY22P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (5). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
TSPY22P data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier5LIHC (108)view →
This table ranks reproducible TSPY22P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High TSPY22P expression shows unfavorable associations in LIHC, SKCM, ESCA, LUAD and LUSC. The LIHC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify LIHC as the clearest survival context for TSPY22P RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
LIHCDFSTertileAll0.1180.569<.001108view →
SKCMOSTertileAll0.4020.793<.00136view →
ESCADFSTertileIII,IV0.1220.448.00518view →
LUADDFSTertileIV0.3330.671.04818view →
LUSCOSTertileAll0.1500.411.02512view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 5 lineages →

TSPY22P-LIHC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for TSPY22P RNA expression in LIHC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes TSPY22P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 1. The strongest signals are observed in LUAD for RNA.
TSPY22P data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot1LUAD (2)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for TSPY22P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. TSPY22P shows lower tumor expression in LUAD. The LUAD box plot shows higher TSPY22P RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.065, t-test p = .016).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
LUADMaleAll−0.065.0162view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 1 lineages →

TSPY22P-LUAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for TSPY22P in LUAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with TSPY22P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, TSPY22P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with COAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA5,063COAD (1785)view →
Function (RNA)2,149PRAD (1060)view →