RNA, U6 small nuclear 695, pseudogeneGenealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6-695P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6-695P expression is associated with patient survival in 17 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6-695P is differentially expressed in 7, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, RNU6-695P RNA expression shows 9,988 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UCEC. Together, these results highlight HNSC, COAD, and UCEC as cancer lineages where RNU6-695P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNU6-695P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNU6-695P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6-695P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (17). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNU6-695P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6-695P expression shows unfavorable associations in HNSC, COAD, LIHC, SKCM and CESC, but favorable associations in KIRC. The HNSC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify HNSC as the clearest survival context for RNU6-695P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNU6-695P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 7. The strongest signals are observed in HNSC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6-695P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6-695P shows lower tumor expression in COAD and KICH and higher tumor expression in HNSC, STAD, LUSC and BLCA. The COAD box plot shows higher RNU6-695P RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.383, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6-695P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6-695P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UCEC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
