RNA, U6 small nuclear 291, pseudogeneGenealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6-291P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6-291P expression is associated with patient survival in 12 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6-291P is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Additionally, RNU6-291P RNA expression shows 6,321 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight HNSC, KICH, and STAD as cancer lineages where RNU6-291P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNU6-291P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNU6-291P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6-291P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (12). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNU6-291P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6-291P expression shows unfavorable associations in CESC, UCEC, ACC and READ, but favorable associations in HNSC and SKCM. The HNSC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify HNSC as the clearest survival context for RNU6-291P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNU6-291P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in KICH for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6-291P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6-291P shows higher tumor expression in KICH and KIRC. The KICH box plot shows higher RNU6-291P RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.304, t-test p = .023).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6-291P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6-291P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
