RNA, U6 small nuclear 163, pseudogeneGenealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6-163P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6-163P expression is associated with patient survival in 7 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6-163P is differentially expressed in 4, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Additionally, RNU6-163P RNA expression shows 5,523 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight STAD, and KICH as cancer lineages where RNU6-163P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNU6-163P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNU6-163P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6-163P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (7). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNU6-163P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6-163P expression shows unfavorable associations in THYM, SKCM, PCPG and KIRP, but favorable associations in STAD and CHOL. The STAD Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p = .013). Together, the overview and detailed table identify STAD as the clearest survival context for RNU6-163P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNU6-163P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 4. The strongest signals are observed in KICH for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6-163P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6-163P shows lower tumor expression in KICH, LUAD and UCEC and higher tumor expression in KIRC. The KICH box plot shows higher RNU6-163P RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.372, t-test p = .002).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6-163P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6-163P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
