RNU1-83P

associated omics data
RNA, U1 small nuclear 83, pseudogeneGenealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU1-83P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU1-83P expression is associated with patient survival in 13 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU1-83P is differentially expressed in 5, with the highest sampling consensus in BRCA. Additionally, RNU1-83P RNA expression shows 5,794 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ESCA. Together, these results highlight HNSC, BRCA, and ESCA as cancer lineages where RNU1-83P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes RNU1-83P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU1-83P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (13). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
RNU1-83P data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier13HNSC (111)view →
This table ranks reproducible RNU1-83P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU1-83P expression shows unfavorable associations in HNSC, UCS, LIHC, UVM, KICH and SARC. The HNSC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify HNSC as the clearest survival context for RNU1-83P RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
HNSCOSTertileII,III,IV0.0820.711<.001111view →
UCSOSTertileIII,IV0.0010.594<.00172view →
LIHCOSTertileII,III,IV0.1050.702<.00142view →
UVMOSTertileAll0.2570.611.01636view →
KICHOSTertileIII,IV0.1780.847<.00127view →
SARCDFSTertileAll0.1990.645<.00124view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 13 lineages →

RNU1-83P-HNSC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for RNU1-83P RNA expression in HNSC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes RNU1-83P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 5. The strongest signals are observed in BRCA for RNA.
RNU1-83P data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot5BRCA (4)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU1-83P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU1-83P shows higher tumor expression in BRCA, PRAD, LUAD, KIRP and COAD. The BRCA box plot shows higher RNU1-83P RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.227, t-test p = .040).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
BRCAFemaleII,III,IV+0.227.0404view →
PRADAllAll+0.075.0112view →
LUADAllAll+0.258.0221view →
KIRPAllAll+0.084.0261view →
COADAllAll+0.077.0431view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 5 lineages →

RNU1-83P-BRCA

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for RNU1-83P in BRCA.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with RNU1-83P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU1-83P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ESCA recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
Function (RNA)5,794ESCA (3160)view →
Protein (mass-spec)5,724GBM (2006)view →