RNA, U1 small nuclear 36, pseudogeneGenealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU1-36P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU1-36P expression is associated with patient survival in 19 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in DLBC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU1-36P is differentially expressed in 8, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Additionally, RNU1-36P RNA expression shows 14,975 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Together, these results highlight DLBC, KICH, and UVM as cancer lineages where RNU1-36P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNU1-36P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNU1-36P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU1-36P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (19). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNU1-36P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU1-36P expression shows unfavorable associations in DLBC, THYM, KIRC, CHOL, MESO and COAD. The DLBC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify DLBC as the clearest survival context for RNU1-36P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNU1-36P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 8. The strongest signals are observed in KICH for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU1-36P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU1-36P shows lower tumor expression in KICH, BRCA, LUSC, UCEC, KIRC and LUAD. The KICH box plot shows higher RNU1-36P RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −1.169, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNU1-36P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU1-36P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UVM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
