Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNA5SP61 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNA5SP61 expression is associated with patient survival in 9 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNA5SP61 is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Additionally, RNA5SP61 RNA expression shows 9,204 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LSCC. Together, these results highlight KICH, STAD, and LSCC as cancer lineages where RNA5SP61 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNA5SP61 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNA5SP61 survival associations across molecular data types. RNA5SP61 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (9). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNA5SP61 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNA5SP61 expression shows unfavorable associations in KICH, READ, BLCA, MESO, THYM and LUAD. The KICH Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KICH as the clearest survival context for RNA5SP61 RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNA5SP61 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in STAD for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNA5SP61. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNA5SP61 shows higher tumor expression in STAD and COAD. The STAD box plot shows higher RNA5SP61 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.196, t-test p = .011).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNA5SP61 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNA5SP61 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LSCC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
