Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RN7SL310P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RN7SL310P expression is associated with patient survival in 9 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in READ. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RN7SL310P is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in LUAD. Additionally, RN7SL310P RNA expression shows 6,404 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight READ, LUAD, and STAD as cancer lineages where RN7SL310P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RN7SL310P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RN7SL310P survival associations across molecular data types. RN7SL310P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (9). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RN7SL310P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RN7SL310P expression shows unfavorable associations in READ, MESO, LIHC, PAAD, STAD and KIRP. The READ Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify READ as the clearest survival context for RN7SL310P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RN7SL310P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in LUSC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RN7SL310P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RN7SL310P shows lower tumor expression in LUAD and LUSC. The LUAD box plot shows higher RN7SL310P RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.152, t-test p = .020).
This table shows molecular features associated with RN7SL310P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RN7SL310P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
