RFC5

mass-spec protein & survival
Survivalmass-specKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, RFC5 mass-spec protein is linked to patient survival in 5 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated RFC5 data layer compared with 28 for mass-spec protein and 4 for mutation status.

The strongest signal is observed in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), where higher RFC5 mass-spec protein is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated RFC5 expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as LUAD and LSCC show a favorable association.

HNSC, CCRCC, and LUAD are the cancer types where RFC5 mass-spec protein most reproducibly stratifies survival.

mass-spec protein survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
HNSCOSMedianAll0.3801.000.00835view →
CCRCCOSTertileAll0.8741.000.00828view →
LUADDFSTertileII,III,IV0.9870.646.01311view →
PDACOSTertileII,III,IV0.4140.631.0078view →
LSCCDFSTertileII,III,IV0.8460.468.0138view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 5 strongest of 5 lineages.

RFC5–HNSC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for RFC5 mass-spec protein-high vs -low samples in HNSC.

Open the HNSC breakdown →

Exploration