PRYP3

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored PRYP3 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. PRYP3 expression is associated with patient survival in 2 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Additionally, PRYP3 RNA expression shows 25 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Together, these results highlight STAD, and KIRP as cancer lineages where PRYP3 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes PRYP3 survival associations across molecular data types. PRYP3 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (2). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.

PRYP3 data type	Survival analysis	Lineage consensus	Lineage of highest sampling consensus
RNA	Kaplan–Meier	2	STAD (108)	view →

This table ranks reproducible PRYP3 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High PRYP3 expression shows unfavorable associations in STAD and PRAD. The STAD Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify STAD as the clearest survival context for PRYP3 RNA expression.

Lineage	Measure	Split	Stage	AUC1 high	AUC2 low	p	Sampling consensus
STAD	OS	Tertile	All	0.069	0.688	<.001	108	view →
PRAD	DFS	Tertile	All	0.113	0.935	<.001	18	view →

Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 2 lineages →

PRYP3-STAD (OS)

Explore this curve interactively →