POLE

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, POLE Mutation is linked to patient survival in 12 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated POLE data layer compared with 27 for mass-spec protein and 5 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), where higher POLE Mutation is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated POLE expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as UCEC and BLCA show a favorable association.

KIRC, ACC, and UCEC are the cancer types where POLE Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCOSMedianII,III,IV0.0850.806<.00136view →
ACCDFSMedianAll0.0670.674<.00136view →
UCECDFSMedianAll0.7590.619<.00136view →
KIRPOSMedianAll0.2670.904<.00124view →
KICHDFSMedianAll0.1020.848.00413view →
ESCADFSMedianAll0.2610.551.00112view →
BLCADFSMedianAll0.7070.317.0208view →
PCPGDFSMedianAll0.0880.768.0026view →
CESCDFSMedianII,III,IV0.4070.713.0426view →
LIHCOSMedianAll0.0150.784<.0016view →
CHOLOSMedianAll0.1550.725.0293view →
LGGDFSMedianAll0.2760.731.0103view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 12 strongest of 12 lineages.

POLE–KIRC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for POLE mutant vs wild-type samples in KIRC.

Open the KIRC breakdown →

Exploration