phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type 1 pseudogene 2Genealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored PIP5K1P2 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. PIP5K1P2 expression is associated with patient survival in 12 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, PIP5K1P2 is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in ESCA. Additionally, PIP5K1P2 RNA expression shows 6,674 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in SARC. Together, these results highlight UVM, ESCA, and SARC as cancer lineages where PIP5K1P2 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for PIP5K1P2 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes PIP5K1P2 survival associations across molecular data types. PIP5K1P2 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (12). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible PIP5K1P2 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High PIP5K1P2 expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, ESCA, BLCA and BRCA, but favorable associations in MESO and SKCM. The UVM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UVM as the clearest survival context for PIP5K1P2 RNA expression.
This table summarizes PIP5K1P2 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for PIP5K1P2. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. PIP5K1P2 shows lower tumor expression in KIRC and higher tumor expression in ESCA. The ESCA box plot shows higher PIP5K1P2 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.060, t-test p = .003).
This table shows molecular features associated with PIP5K1P2 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, PIP5K1P2 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with SARC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
