MEFV

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, MEFV Mutation is linked to patient survival in 11 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated MEFV data layer compared with 25 for mass-spec protein and 3 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC), where higher MEFV Mutation is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated MEFV expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as STAD and UCEC show a favorable association.

CESC, READ, and STAD are the cancer types where MEFV Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
CESCOSMedianIII,IV0.0910.755<.00130view →
READDFSMedianII,III,IV0.0590.818<.00128view →
STADOSMedianAll1.0000.403.01918view →
BRCAOSMedianIII,IV0.2110.833<.00112view →
UCECDFSMedianAll0.9750.827.01210view →
THCADFSMedianAll0.0910.841<.0016view →
SARCDFSMedianAll0.1860.616.0016view →
PRADDFSMedianAll0.6170.886.0456view →
BLCAOSMedianIV0.0510.600<.0016view →
ACCOSMedianAll0.1470.685.0186view →
SKCMDFSMedianII,III,IV0.7990.529.0104view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 11 strongest of 11 lineages.

MEFV–CESC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for MEFV mutant vs wild-type samples in CESC.

Open the CESC breakdown →

Exploration