long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 2010Genealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored LINC02010 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. LINC02010 expression is associated with patient survival in 12 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UCEC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, LINC02010 is differentially expressed in 1, with the highest sampling consensus in LUSC. Additionally, LINC02010 RNA expression shows 5,991 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight UCEC, LUSC, and STAD as cancer lineages where LINC02010 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for LINC02010 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes LINC02010 survival associations across molecular data types. LINC02010 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (12). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible LINC02010 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High LINC02010 expression shows unfavorable associations in UCEC, PAAD, LGG, TGCT and LUSC, but favorable associations in UCS. The UCEC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UCEC as the clearest survival context for LINC02010 RNA expression.
This table summarizes LINC02010 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 1. The strongest signals are observed in LUSC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for LINC02010. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. LINC02010 shows lower tumor expression in LUSC. The LUSC box plot shows higher LINC02010 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.009, t-test p = .047).
This table shows molecular features associated with LINC02010 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, LINC02010 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
