long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1692Genealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored LINC01692 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. LINC01692 expression is associated with patient survival in 18 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, LINC01692 is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, LINC01692 RNA expression shows 6,414 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight KICH, COAD, and STAD as cancer lineages where LINC01692 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for LINC01692 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes LINC01692 survival associations across molecular data types. LINC01692 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (18). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible LINC01692 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High LINC01692 expression shows unfavorable associations in KICH, UVM, KIRC, ACC and UCEC, but favorable associations in UCS. The KICH Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KICH as the clearest survival context for LINC01692 RNA expression.
This table summarizes LINC01692 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for LINC01692. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. LINC01692 shows lower tumor expression in COAD and higher tumor expression in LIHC. The COAD box plot shows higher LINC01692 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.005, t-test p = .038).
This table shows molecular features associated with LINC01692 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, LINC01692 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
