KMT2D

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, KMT2D Mutation is linked to patient survival in 13 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated KMT2D data layer compared with 19 for mass-spec protein and 4 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), where higher KMT2D Mutation is associated with worse disease-free survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated KMT2D expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as BLCA and STAD show a favorable association.

UCS, LUSC, and COAD are the cancer types where KMT2D Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UCSDFSMedianII,III,IV0.1190.478.00218view →
LUSCDFSMedianII,III,IV0.4160.772.01115view →
COADOSMedianIV0.1740.684<.00112view →
BLCAOSMedianAll0.7940.343.02312view →
READDFSMedianAll0.1820.798.0109view →
SKCMDFSMedianIV0.0360.433<.0019view →
THCADFSMedianAll0.1330.842.0016view →
DLBCOSMedianIII,IV0.1721.000.0146view →
ESCAOSMedianIII,IV0.2660.586.0266view →
LIHCOSMedianAll0.4440.778.0106view →
STADOSMedianIII,IV0.8020.350.0085view →
PRADDFSMedianAll0.7260.936.0382view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 12 strongest of 13 lineages.

KMT2D–UCS (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for KMT2D mutant vs wild-type samples in UCS.

Open the UCS breakdown →

Exploration