EYA4

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, EYA4 Mutation is linked to patient survival in 10 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated EYA4 data layer compared with 25 for mass-spec protein and 1 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), where higher EYA4 Mutation is associated with worse disease-free survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated EYA4 expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as UCEC and STAD show a favorable association.

UCS, UCEC, and HNSC are the cancer types where EYA4 Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UCSDFSMedianAll0.0680.524<.00148view →
UCECDFSMedianAll0.9640.823.00432view →
HNSCOSMedianAll0.1690.714<.00118view →
LGGDFSMedianAll0.2300.753.00512view →
SARCDFSMedianAll0.0380.611<.00112view →
COADDFSMedianIV0.0350.501<.0016view →
PRADDFSMedianAll0.1870.777.0084view →
STADDFSMedianIII,IV1.0000.574.0394view →
BLCAOSMedianIV0.1410.573.0343view →
SKCMOSMedianII,III,IV0.4940.290.0431view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 10 strongest of 10 lineages.

EYA4–UCS (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for EYA4 mutant vs wild-type samples in UCS.

Open the UCS breakdown →

Exploration