ENPP2

mass-spec protein & survival
Survivalmass-specKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, ENPP2 mass-spec protein is linked to patient survival in 6 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated ENPP2 data layer compared with 21 for mass-spec protein and 8 for mutation status.

The strongest signal is observed in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC), where higher ENPP2 mass-spec protein is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated ENPP2 expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as PDAC show a favorable association.

UCEC, LUAD, and PDAC are the cancer types where ENPP2 mass-spec protein most reproducibly stratifies survival.

mass-spec protein survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UCECOSTertileII,III,IV0.5001.000.01124view →
LUADOSMedianII,III,IV0.7951.000.00520view →
PDACOSMedianII,III,IV0.9600.706<.00117view →
CCRCCDFSMedianIII,IV0.1450.774.0166view →
GBMOSMedianAll0.7970.915.0361view →
LSCCOSTertileAll0.8181.000.0491view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 6 strongest of 6 lineages.

ENPP2–UCEC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for ENPP2 mass-spec protein-high vs -low samples in UCEC.

Open the UCEC breakdown →

Exploration