EGFLAM-AS2

associated omics data
EGFLAM antisense RNA 2Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored EGFLAM-AS2 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. EGFLAM-AS2 expression is associated with patient survival in 15 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, EGFLAM-AS2 is differentially expressed in 1, with the highest sampling consensus in LUSC. Additionally, EGFLAM-AS2 RNA expression shows 8,410 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in GBM. Together, these results highlight ACC, LUSC, and GBM as cancer lineages where EGFLAM-AS2 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes EGFLAM-AS2 survival associations across molecular data types. EGFLAM-AS2 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (15). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
EGFLAM-AS2 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier15ACC (108)view →
This table ranks reproducible EGFLAM-AS2 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High EGFLAM-AS2 expression shows unfavorable associations in ACC, LIHC, OV, READ, UCS and BLCA. The ACC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify ACC as the clearest survival context for EGFLAM-AS2 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
ACCDFSTertileAll0.1140.772<.001108view →
LIHCOSTertileII,III,IV0.2100.636.00972view →
OVDFSTertileII,III,IV0.4590.563.00954view →
READOSTertileAll0.2240.669.00239view →
UCSOSTertileII,III,IV0.3610.663.02636view →
BLCADFSTertileAll0.4820.629.00436view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 15 lineages →

EGFLAM-AS2-ACC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for EGFLAM-AS2 RNA expression in ACC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes EGFLAM-AS2 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 1. The strongest signals are observed in LUSC for RNA.
EGFLAM-AS2 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot1LUSC (2)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for EGFLAM-AS2. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. EGFLAM-AS2 shows higher tumor expression in LUSC. The LUSC box plot shows higher EGFLAM-AS2 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.025, t-test p = .005).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
LUSCMaleAll+0.025.0052view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 1 lineages →

EGFLAM-AS2-LUSC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for EGFLAM-AS2 in LUSC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with EGFLAM-AS2 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, EGFLAM-AS2 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with GBM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
Protein (mass-spec)8,410GBM (3413)view →
Function (RNA)6,662STAD (6019)view →