EFR3A

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, EFR3A Mutation is linked to patient survival in 7 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated EFR3A data layer compared with 22 for mass-spec protein and 5 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), where higher EFR3A Mutation is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated EFR3A expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as UCEC and STAD show a favorable association.

UCS, UCEC, and COAD are the cancer types where EFR3A Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UCSOSMedianAll0.0010.690<.00136view →
UCECDFSMedianAll0.9460.603.00216view →
COADOSMedianAll0.5700.873.00210view →
SKCMDFSMedianIV0.0360.433<.00110view →
STADDFSMedianAll1.0000.388.0299view →
PRADDFSMedianAll0.0850.774<.0016view →
LUSCOSMedianAll0.0030.819<.0016view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 7 strongest of 7 lineages.

EFR3A–UCS (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for EFR3A mutant vs wild-type samples in UCS.

Open the UCS breakdown →

Exploration