CTTNBP2

Mutation & survival
SurvivalMutationKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, CTTNBP2 Mutation is linked to patient survival in 11 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated CTTNBP2 data layer compared with 26 for mass-spec protein and 4 for mass-spec protein.

The strongest signal is observed in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), where higher CTTNBP2 Mutation is associated with worse overall survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated CTTNBP2 expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as UCEC show a favorable association.

LUAD, SKCM, and KICH are the cancer types where CTTNBP2 Mutation most reproducibly stratifies survival.

Mutation survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
LUADOSMedianII,III,IV0.3250.719<.00140view →
SKCMDFSMedianAll0.3690.771<.00114view →
KICHDFSMedianAll0.1020.848.00413view →
SCLCOSMedianIV0.1370.548.00412view →
BLCAOSMedianIII,IV0.0630.582<.00112view →
UCECDFSMedianAll0.9170.608.01410view →
MESODFSMedianIII,IV0.0780.376.0129view →
COADOSMedianIII,IV0.1860.799<.0016view →
DLBCOSMedianII,III,IV0.1180.802.0253view →
READOSMedianII,III,IV0.1870.653.0303view →
LGGOSMedianAll0.3060.799.0093view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 11 strongest of 11 lineages.

CTTNBP2–LUAD (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CTTNBP2 mutant vs wild-type samples in LUAD.

Open the LUAD breakdown →

Exploration