CNTNAP2-AS1

associated omics data
CNTNAP2 antisense RNA 1Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored CNTNAP2-AS1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. CNTNAP2-AS1 expression is associated with patient survival in 14 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in BLCA. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, CNTNAP2-AS1 is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in LUAD. Additionally, CNTNAP2-AS1 RNA expression shows 6,346 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight BLCA, LUAD, and STAD as cancer lineages where CNTNAP2-AS1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes CNTNAP2-AS1 survival associations across molecular data types. CNTNAP2-AS1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (14). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
CNTNAP2-AS1 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier14LUAD (42)view →
This table ranks reproducible CNTNAP2-AS1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High CNTNAP2-AS1 expression shows unfavorable associations in CHOL, KIRC and HNSC, but favorable associations in BLCA, LUAD and GBM. The BLCA Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p = .012). Together, the overview and detailed table identify BLCA as the clearest survival context for CNTNAP2-AS1 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
BLCAOSTertileIII,IV0.8500.199.01242view →
LUADDFSTertileAll0.9320.743.00742view →
GBMDFSTertileAll0.4810.175.00118view →
CHOLDFSTertileAll0.0370.486.00118view →
KIRCDFSTertileIV0.3340.640.01618view →
HNSCOSTertileIII,IV0.2700.683.00518view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 14 lineages →

CNTNAP2-AS1-BLCA (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CNTNAP2-AS1 RNA expression in BLCA: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes CNTNAP2-AS1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in LUAD for RNA.
CNTNAP2-AS1 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot2LUAD (2)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for CNTNAP2-AS1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. CNTNAP2-AS1 shows lower tumor expression in LUAD and higher tumor expression in KIRC. The LUAD box plot shows higher CNTNAP2-AS1 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.021, t-test p = .006).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
LUADFemaleAll−0.021.0062view →
KIRCAllAll+0.003.0451view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 2 lineages →

CNTNAP2-AS1-LUAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for CNTNAP2-AS1 in LUAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with CNTNAP2-AS1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, CNTNAP2-AS1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
Function (RNA)6,346STAD (6037)view →
Protein (mass-spec)4,387GBM (3966)view →