CILP

mass-spec protein & survival
Survivalmass-specKaplan–Meier · TCGA cohorts

Across TCGA pan-cancer cohorts, CILP mass-spec protein is linked to patient survival in 6 of 34 cancer types, making it a survival-associated CILP data layer compared with 18 for mass-spec protein and 8 for mutation status.

The strongest signal is observed in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), where higher CILP mass-spec protein is associated with worse disease-free survival. In most high-consensus cancer types, elevated CILP expression acts as an unfavorable survival marker, although some lineages such as LUAD and CCRCC show a favorable association.

LSCC, PDAC, and LUAD are the cancer types where CILP mass-spec protein most reproducibly stratifies survival.

mass-spec protein survival associations by lineage

Ranked by sampling consensus. AUC1 and AUC2 indicate survival in the high- and low-expression groups, respectively; the lower AUC marks the poorer-surviving group. p-values are from the log-rank test.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
LSCCDFSQuartileAll0.5050.854.00125view →
PDACOSQuartileIII,IV0.1950.645.00322view →
LUADDFSTertileII,III,IV0.9810.730.00713view →
COADDFSMedianIII,IV0.8981.000.0476view →
CCRCCOSMedianAll0.9160.660.0401view →
HNSCDFSQuartileIII,IV0.8210.609.0481view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. Showing the 6 strongest of 6 lineages.

CILP–LSCC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CILP mass-spec protein-high vs -low samples in LSCC.

Open the LSCC breakdown →

Exploration